The much loved Federer edged a first-set tie-break but then threw away a commanding position in the second to let the Latvian back in.
Gulbis eventually beat the legendary favourite 6-7 (5), 7-6 (3), 6-2, 4-6, 6-3.
The underdog reflected later:
”I was a bit lucky in the second set when he had the smash (for the set). But I penetrated his backhand and served it out well in the end.”
Gulbis, who made himself unpopular recently by suggesting that women should think more about having families than playing tennis, acknowledged that he had few friends against Federer on Court Philippe Chatrier.
‘It was the biggest wins of my career and sorry to the crowd, I know how much you support Roger. But I hope I won over some fans today and I’ll have more fans tomorrow against Thomas Berdych.’ After three hours and forty-two minutes, Federer left the stage a forlorn figure in purely sporting terms, knowing he had squandered progress by taking his eye off the ball when he was on top. Perhaps the arrival of his new twins had proved too demanding behind the scenes, or maybe Federer simply shot himself in the foot by being too casual when he looked odds-on to progress to the quarter-finals.
But Federer will need no reminder when he reaches the All England Club that he must put opponents away ruthlessly when he has the chance. The longer he allows a match to continue at his age, the more damage Federer does to his chances in a Grand Slam event these days.
Only a rediscovery of his killer instinct will give Roger hope of clinching another Wimbledon title.
He knows he can count on massive support at the All England Club for what will probably represent his last realistic chance of Wimbledon glory.
Want to be there to watch the great man give everything to Wimbledon one more time?
That’s what separates the champs from the also-rans. The very best find a way, even when it doesn’t quite feel like their day.
‘I lost my head once at Roland Garros when I was young,’ reflected Federer. ‘Now I just increase my focus.’
Both Fed and Novak wobbled to drop sets against Dmitry Tursunov and Marin Cilic respectively at Roland Garros. But crucially, both superstars struck back immediately to show who was really in charge. Federer won his first set 7-5, dropped the second to an excellent Tursunov tie-break, but hit straight back with a break early in the third to resume control and take the set 6-2. He never looked back and wrapped up victory over the ailing Russian 6-4 in the fourth. Overall it was an impressive display.
Roger said afterwards: ‘I thought I had control, Dmitry is always tough but I served well and even though I had to be careful with my work I thought I was a deserved winner.’
4 in three hours and eleven minutes. Novak said later:’It all went well for the first two sets but then I dropped my intensity and he came back. He pushed me to the limit but at the end of the day I won and that’s what matters most.’ Cilic, the 25th seed, blended wrist-inspired power with deftly-carved drop shots to take a third-set tie-break 7-2. Yet Djokovic raced to a three-game advantage in the fourth after saving triple break points on his own serve. Despite a fresh Cilic comeback, the popular Serb finished the job to put a testing afternoon behind him.
Meanwhile Poland’s Agniezska Radwanska was unable to show similar tenacity against one of Cilic’s lesser-known compatriots. Radwanska lost 4-6, 4-6 to Ajla Tomljanovic of Croatia in the shock of the day.
5 behind before she began to claw her way back into the first set at Roland Garros. But she failed to raise her game for long enough to mount a meaningful fightback. Instead the world number 72, who has suffered from glandular fever in the past, clinched the unlikely victory which propels her into the big-time.
Romania’s Simona Halep is now the highest remaining seed left in the women’s draw, though Maria Sharapova’s vastly superior experience makes her a strong contender for the title.
Want to see some more gloriously unpredictable tennis at Wimbledon next month? Want to witness the greats up-close-and-personal, digging deep to prevail?
Just click on the following link…
Spencer Gore was the first winner, though Britain’s William Renshaw was the first 19th-Century tennis star, with his seven Wimbledon wins in the 1880s.
